This is another great myth still being told — even by the so-called experts who testified in front of Congress during the last year and a half or so in support of the Dark Act.
The United States National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine have established a committee to study the “economic, agronomic, health, safety, or other impacts of genetically engineered (GE) crops and food.” The committee’s results may be used to reassess the way GE crops, animals and foods are regulated in the U.S. and, hopefully, to improve that loophole-filled “regulatory” process. (For more information on the committee’s purpose and history, or for submitting comments, please see the committee’s website.)
Now, while this national review is taking place, is a good time to review the differences between genetic engineering and traditional breeding. The following lists serve to contrast the biological processes that underlie these technologies.
Traditional Breeding (i.e. its biological basis: sexual reproduction):
- Evolved over eons (along with “checkpoint” mechanisms to eliminate mistakes)
- Occurs between closely related organisms
- Genetic exchange occurs in reproductive cells,
- and occurs between related chromosomes,
View original post 226 more words